"Speaking truth in times of great moral conflict and universal deciet, will always be a TART mission"–TART

Project: Regeneration

Sexism alive and well

The College Republican branch at Fordham University invited  a woman…..thats right a woman named Ann Coulter to speak at their campus on November 29. After finding out the speaker whom college republicans had invited was to be a woman, the university president Joeseph Mcshane said,

“The event is funded through student activity fees and is not open to the public nor the media. Student groups are allowed, and encouraged, to invite speakers who represent diverse, and sometimes unpopular, points of view, in keeping with the canons of academic freedom. Accordingly, the University will not block the College Republicans from hosting their speaker of choice on campus.

To say that I am disappointed with the judgment and maturity of the College Republicans, however, would be a tremendous understatement.”

Wow the president appalled at the college republicans maturity for inviting a woman.

Just Kidding:

Well I was only joking about the woman part the president is really “Disappointed” in the college republicans over their choice and thats just an “understatement”. I only added the woman twist to see what it feels like to be a liberal throwing out people to become poster minorities and use them to drum up supporters who want to silence free speech. Look this president hasn’t blocked the college republicans [CR’s] choice. Therefore no one should try and block the presidents choice to use his free speech in a method he wishes. The big issue people are raising in this story is thefact the president simultaneously knocks the CR’s conduct while bashing Ann Coulter as not being a legitimate voice for conservatism like he did here:

[“There are many people who can speak to the conservative point of view with integrity and conviction, but Ms. Coulter is not among them. Her rhetoric is often hateful and needlessly provocative—more heat than light—and her message is aimed squarely at the darker side of our nature.

As members of a Jesuit institution, we are called upon to deal with one another with civility and compassion, not to sling mud and impugn the motives of those with whom we disagree or to engage in racial or social stereotyping. In the wake of several bias incidents last spring, I told the University community that I hold out great contempt for anyone who would intentionally inflict pain on another human being because of their race, gender, sexual orientation, or creed.
“Disgust” was the word I used to sum up my feelings about those incidents. Hate speech, name-calling, and incivility are completely at odds with the Jesuit ideals that have always guided and animated Fordham.

Still, to prohibit Ms. Coulter from speaking at Fordham would be to do greater violence to the academy, and to the Jesuit tradition of fearless and robust engagement. Preventing Ms. Coulter from speaking would counter one wrong with another. The old saw goes that the answer to bad speech is more speech. This is especially true at a university, and I fully expect our students, faculty, alumni, parents, and staff to voice their opposition, civilly and respectfully, and forcefully.

The College Republicans have unwittingly provided Fordham with a test of its character: do we abandon our ideals in the face of repugnant speech and seek to stifle Ms. Coulter’s (and the student organizers’) opinions, or do we use her appearance as an opportunity to prove that our ideas are better and our faith in the academy—and one another—stronger? We have chosen the latter course, confident in our community, and in the power of decency and reason to overcome hatred and prejudice.
Joseph M. McShane, S.J., President”] see letter here

My Opinion= Consistency:

Look is the President an open progressive socialist? yes. Is the president anti-american? possibly. Has the president silence the CR’s? No.

And that last question is by far the most important one just as he encourages others not to silence the speech of other, we too must respect the presidents speech thanks to the great document that we call the constitution.

One last thing that I’d like to add is a memory from my college life. While I was attended college there was a time when I saw signs advertising a speaker who was coming to speak at my University and whom was invited by our local branch of college progressives (i can’t recall the group)  and the man they were inviting was a black socialist progressive professor whom I had often seen on tv arguing with Sean Hannity. This mans beliefs, ideals, and rhetoric was often something that I found to be communistic, misguided, and offensive. The difference is I nor any CR’s on campus protested this mans coming. Just like in the Fordham case those progressives only sought to protect their free speech. Eventually CR’s invited the Genocide awareness project to campus and quickly received protests. Let me tell ou as someone whom was there at the tie the things the protestors were shouting about the CR’s were obscene however I wouldn’t have had them silenced because that would have violated the protesters right to speech. Now some non-obscene examples of what the protesters did were: shout into megaphones at people like myself who were just pasing by; started a petition to have the genocide awareness project removed fom campus; heck there were even guys wearing shirts that said I dig pro-choice chicks which to me just said he liked the easily open sex access with no responsibility…but again it was his right to say those things. See an article about that memory of mine here.

In closing my opinion/my point is this, I expect those who read this and those who may feel outrage toward the Fordham president don’t lash out at him instead encourage him and his speech while also encouraging the CR’s and ms. Coulter with their speech; it is by doing such that we carry on the dreams of our founding fathers.

Speak without fear,

Milton L. Jefferson



Our new Take Action Tab!!!

Do you want to preserve freedom? Do you want less government? Do you want less taxes? Do want to join the fight in helping protect America from Socialism?

If you answered yes to all of the above, then I suggest its time for you to take action.

Here at TART we wanted to make it easier for you to take action, so we created our TAKE ACTION button.

This button depicts a hard working American picking up a hammer to reforge America, so please pick up a hammer and join us.

Look for this button to be included in all articles which might inspire action like those project: regeneration articles.
take action logo

Socialist Professor Attacks American-ness

teaching socialism

An editor for the collegefix recently posted on how a political science teacher published a syllabus  which told students to leave their “American-ness, White-ness, Male-ness” at the door. All in the name of using “Inclusive ” language I thought inclusive language INCLUded  everyone, even those pesky American White Males. Funny this same professor quoted Obamas church UCC. So why isn’t NBC or CNN publishing this story about the UCC’s war on American White Men after all they didn’t hesitate to quote Romneys religious beliefs as a “War on Women”.

All this “Inclusive talk reminds me of this video from Jon Stewart,

You know people are downplaying this already saying no student would do that nor fall for that Anti-American syllabus and bloggers are even condemning those who say this is a sign Socialism  has taken over our universities, like I do believe. I mean if its not true that Socialism is now the institutionalized philosophy of University’s then why was I able to find this syllabus much like the one currently in dispute.

Click here for the other syllabus I found!!

Nor why my textbook during college stated this: “In offering a sociological understanding of crime, this book suggests that the “get tough” approach is short-sighted since it ignores the roots of crime in the social structure and social inequality of society. To reduce crime, we must address these structural conditions and appreciate the role that factors such as race and ethnicity, gender, and social class play in criminal behavior.”

Look Around, it happening now!

Make sure you question with boldness,

Milton L. Jefferson

A Re-generation Hollywood Teen; Speaking without Fear!!!

Recently a Teenage Hollywood actor spoke out against his own show calling it “Filth”.  Why is this news worthy? Because it is shocking  Shocking that in today’s time anyone might stand on principles and morals to speak truth, that’s before you include the unbelievable facts that the someone is a Hollywood actor and a Teenager/young adult. Who is this bold Regenerationer? His name is Angus T. Jones and he is the kid star from the TV show Two and a half men. This kid became a christian at age 19 and has since found his principles conflicting with those that the show depicts. Angus calls the show filth and urges kids not to watch it, we need more young men like him standing as true examples for the next generation. Now on a personal note I don’t agree with silencing someone or some show, however I do believe that kids shouldn’t look to charlie sheen nor Ashton Kutcher as moral role models and on that facet I find I disagree with Angus. Don’t tell kids to not watch it just make sure they know its filth and that Charlie/Ashton are not men to model themselves after.

Below is a news clip of Angus as he spoke without fear,


Speak without fear,

Milton L. Jefferson

International Communications Union [ITU] is After Control of The Internet

“Internet in ITU hands”

Their Plan:

According to the Kansas City Star,

“Delegates from 193 countries will gather Dec. 3 in the city-state of Dubai to consider plans for changing how the Internet is run.Hosted by the International Telecommunication Union, an arm of the United Nations, the conference agenda includes 450 proposals for changes in international communications regulations. Some of these proposals are benign. But others threaten to undermine the Internet freedoms that are essential to spurring economic growth and protecting human rights.”

Thats right the U.N. is now making a grab for the internet and what will they do once they have it? Will they silence opposition, censor speech, or just license out its use for a small fee? Its a safe bet to guess that it will no longer be a free spout off on Facebook type medium any longer, should the ITU get their hands on it. Why? Because this ITU movement is spearheaded by freedoms enemies China, Russia, etc. and none of them have been tolerative of their own citizens free speech. Why then might they indulge Americas free speech?

The point is freedom is yet again under attack and its not just those crazy informed patriots who are saying this, liberal-progressive institutions like Google and Facebook are also speaking out. A Google spokesperson said,

“More than 100 organizations from 50+ countries have raised concerns about an upcoming closed-door meeting in December in Dubai, where governments will consider proposals to increase regulation and censorship of the Internet. People can learn more about the issue on our website — and if they choose to do so, can pledge their support for a free and open Internet.”

My Opinion:

Honestly I say give it to the ITU (U.N.), maybe then Google and Facebook will see progessivism for what it is and maybe, just maybe, they’ll begin backing away from the radicals like Obama. Also I believe such an act might further the purpose of Project: Regeneration by waking up those uninformed patriots out there who have fallen victim to progressive/socialist ideals or even voter efficacy. Once they see they have to pay to use Facebook and even when they pay to use it they can’t rant like they use to, maybe then they’ll TAKE ACTION. I think Bruce Wayne had it right, “People need dramatic examples to shake them out of Apathy.” which reminds me when I saw a little bit of Regeneration earlier this week at the grocery store where to friends wear in search of wonder bread only for me to inform them that they went out of business because they were owned by Hostess whom had fallen victim to unions; or when I heard a father explaining to his little girl that her favorite snack Twinkies might live on because a Mexican bakery was trying to buy the recipe to make them. The dramatic example hasn’t been dramatic enough its going to take something bigger. These people indicated a slight awakening of America but they still aren’t quite there; for instance the father should have told his daughter “I’m sorry sweety but the evil unions killed Hostess the baker that makes our American Twinkies that way she would grow up having a realistic view toward unions one which could withstand the lessons taught by liberal professors. Hence if a professor tried to profess of how great unions are she would have that said memory of her dead friend Hostess to remind her of the TRUTH.

Hold to the TRUTH,

Milton L. Jefferson

Finding Nemo, Anti-American?

I Couldn’t believe my ears when watching the Pixar Disney movie today as a childrens movie began spewing Anti-American rhetoric.

After hearing it I immediately posted it on the TART youtube channel here is the clip:

In this clip, the sharks become aware of nemo being stolen. The sharks reply by saying with disdain “Humans, think they own everything.” “Probably American”. First of all the divers in this film are portrayed as cold evil machine like villains (the sharks are depicted as being more caring than the divers).

Next, the sharks associate the divers with America, but wait lets not forget the divers were really Australian …. So why bring up America at all? Well the progressive mind might respond to that question by saying, “WHY NOT take an opportunity where we suggest to kids that Americans are cold, machine like, and think they can take everything?

This isn’t just anti-american, the quote “Humans, think they can take everything” is also Globalist, Green, UN Agenda 21 rhetoric where the progressives seek to guilt trip our youth continuously through school  the movies, and even book; by having them think humans are evil and are destroying our planet. This way who else can save the planet, except the a global governance? Some may find my distaste towards such propaganda, as being over sensitive; to those I might ask was it over sensitivity that lost us the last generation to the socialist progressive mainstream ideals? I think that what lost us that generation was not being sensitive to this stuff, not being attentive enough, and most of all turning a blind eye to our children at times when we believed them to be free from such anti-american influence. Before this past year I would have never thought twice about leaving my kids in front of a Disney Pixar movie, that’s when they’re minds are suppose to be free to imagine and free from mainstream guilt trips like this.

Right about now you’re probably thinking “well I just won’t let my kids watch Pixar any longer.

First of all, I am not suggesting nor will I suggest you boycott someone at an attempt to censor them. We don’t want to silence our opposition, instead we want to lend our voice to our allies. Silencing Pixar is the lazy way out and the lazy way is what got us here to begin with. Instead we must critically review these voices with our children and strive to seek the truth with our children, then once we’ve found the truth we must teach our children to hold on to the truth so that no future generation will forget what it means to be patriotic.

Second, where will you go once you’ve silenced that entertainment source? Where will you go then? to their competitors (Dreamworks)? Really? Let us then look at Dreamworks another animation studio producing movies that entertain our children. Their CEO Jeffrey Katzenberg, has donated $2.566 millon to advance these progressive ideals. So what then? Will you silence them? No instead you should regenerate a new genration of informed patriots so that 20 years down the road when they begin their careers, those who might choose to become animators will then animate in such a way to further patriotic American ideals. We’ve already seen this with Iron-Man and the Avengers; the games not over yet, we still have a shot to regenerate the heart of America.

In concluding, I must ask “Do you still believe that there’s not a war waging over the Americas youth (AKA Americas spirit, Americas future)?”  These types of Progressive subversion’s are already institutionalized and are occurring everywhere; That is why it now falls upon the shoulders of informed patriots to be shy no longer. To speak up by shouting out the truth without fear so that not one more citizen falls prey to these false claims and socialistic ideals. As a wise blogger once wrote, “If you can’t take up a sword then for gods sake pick up a pen.”  This is why we at TART decided the REGENERATION of Americas youth is so important. Its why we were determined to bring Project Regeneration to the forefront of our TART mission. Through this project we can help inform one another, sending the two lanterns so that other Americans might know that “The progressives are here! The Socialists are here! … They’re coming by movies, by schools, and by books!”

Emergency is upon us let us be shy no longer,

Milton L. Jefferson

Presidential Trivia: Quiz #2

Here is Quiz #2 in the TART series presidential Trivia.

The Topic: Religion

The Contenders: Lincoln, Kennedy, Washington, and Obama